Stan's thoughts about Ukraine

 

Ukraine's temporary 'woo'

- it goes much deeper into the past than the “Budapest Memorandum''. They  had their own country, a commonwealth-confederation together with the kingdom of Poland and the great principality of Lithuania (until 1795) but they didn’t like it and the Ukrainian oligarchs broke it up by asking the tsarina of Moscow for “protection”. They got what they asked for! Dissatisfied, the Ukrainian elites tried to find some new big faraway “friends”, the Swedes, Austrians, even Nazi Germans. How did that work for them? After the Budapest lesson the politicians of independent Ukraine tried to be nice to Americans especially to the president 'whose number was 44' and his demonic pedoparty. How nice have Americans been to Ukraine? So nice that the US Democratic politicians with Biden’s family crime syndicate on top plus some Trump's people helped institutionalize and exploit the state corruption rather than fight it! They also 'helped' isolate Ukraine from all potential regional allies. Time to rethink everything.

Stan Bleszynski, 5-Dec-2023, Buckhorn

Reference - post by Alexy Arestovich:

Warning to Gay and Lesbian Movements

Warning to Gay and Lesbian Movements.
(Polish version - see below. Wersja Polska - poniżej)

As LGBT movement became radicalized and more visible than ever, it appears to have been either set-up, or infiltrated and hijacked, by the leftist political parties in most of the Western countries, (to a lesser degree, including also the former Eastern Europe) .

You are being used as a tool to destabilize the society by antagonizing yourself against it and forcing a debate on the issues that are irrelevant for most people.

At the same time these sideline issues are distracting taking up valuable media time away from the real issues to be fought over, such as high taxes, overblown public sector, and the Globalist Parasite - their corporate welfare state.

Worst of all, you are going to find out soon that the political & corporate elites (and the Catholic Church hierarchy in some countries such as Poland, Italy, Spain etc) are about to use you as the scapegoats to blame you for their own pedophilia scandal, as more and more facts are going to become known to the public and the whole knowledge of child abuses is exploding all over the world!

To hide their own insider cult practices and rituals, and their secret belief system responsible for their mental degeneration and perversions, the political and corporate elites will try to deflect media campaign to blame the homosexualism itself. Watch out because you are just about to get thrown under the bus by the very same political forces that have until now financed and promoted your movement. You have only very little time to walk away or switch over to the other political side who, although have no particular love towards you nor intention to promote you, will nevertheless give you some protection as per basic human rights and decency on the political Right. Christians (especially Protestants) will help you too!

Take Care,
Heretic

POLISH VERSION - WERSJA POLSKA

Ostrzeżenie dla publicznych organizacji homoseksualistów

W miarę jak ruch LGBT (Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transvestites) rósł w siłę i stał się bardzo widoczny na scenie politycznej i medialnej, wydaje się, że ruch ten został całkowicie zdominowany, zinwigilowany lub też od początku założony przez lewicowe partie polityczne. Tak się stało w większości krajów Zachodu jak również w trochę mniejszym stopniu, w krajach Europy Wschodniej.

Jesteście wykorzystywani jako narzędzie destabilizacji społecznej dlatego że zostaliście wystawieni na przeciw większości ludzi, forsując debaty publiczne na temat który dla większości społeczeństwa jest nieistotny. Tym samym pomagacie elitom politycznym odwracać uwagę od tematów które dla sił rządzących są zagrożeniem, jak na przykład za wysokie podatki, zbyt rozbudowany sektor publiczny, oraz bardzo ważny temat "ośmiornica" Globalizmu i jego socializm korporacyjny.

Co gorsza, wkrótce przekonacie się, że elity polityczno-korporacyjne Zachodu (oraz hierarchia kościoła Katolickiego w krajach katolickich w których mają realna władzę, jak Polska, Włochy, Hiszpania itp.) zamierzają zrobić z Was "kozłów ofiarnych" winiąc Was za skandale pedofilskie na szczytach władzy, zwłaszcza jak coraz więcej faktów zostaje ujawnionych, a wiedza o perwersji i wykorzystywaniu dzieci przez zdegenerowane moralnie elity władzy zaczyna w świadomości społecznej eksplodować, w skali globalnej!

W celu ukrycia obrzędów kultowych i praktyk w tajnych stowarzyszeniach na szczytach władzy, które są bezpośrednią przyczyną ich degeneracji umysłowej i perwersjii, elity te będą próbowały zrzucić winę wyłącznie na homoseksualizm! Proszę bardzo uważać gdyż wkrótce znajdziecie się "pod wozem", wrzuceni przez tych samych polityków którzy Was dotychczas promowali i finansowali.

Macie bardzo mało czasu aby się wycofać z nadmiernie eksponowanych ruchów i wystawionych na widok a więc niebezpiecznych ustawień, w stronę zupełnie innych stronnictw i ruchów politycznych, które, choć Was nie hołubią ani nie darzą specjalną sympatią, tym niemniej są w stanie zapewnić Wam jakieś bezpieczeństwo. Choćby w ramach praw człowieka i zwyczajowej tolerancji (na prawicy). Również wiele organizacji Chrześcijańskich jest w stanie Wam pomoc, szczególnie Protestanckich.

Trzymajcie sie,
Heretyk

Britain isn’t even keeping pace with the EU "corpse" in spite of cheap pound

Interesting article:

As the UK economy sputters, it's all systems go in the eurozone,

Richard Partington

Quote:

"We’ve shackled ourselves to a corpse," said Douglas Carswell in the days before he abandoned the Tory whip to join Ukip. "We pay for the privilege of being members of this poverty-producing club."

Read more on Brexit here.

Societal destruction using radicalized minorities - Marcuse legacy

Ever wondered why does the Left whack the unsuspecting middle classes with the salvos of politically correct intolerance? Why did radical Left o focus on black Americans, working hard to radicalize them even after all the legislation has been equalized? Ever wondered why the Radical Left and the academics are now focusing hard at radicalizing LGBT community setting them up against a generally tolerant mainstream society, creating artificial conflicts where there has been none and escalating various issues and pressing new demands? Ever wondered who and why exactly unleashed a flood of bogus refugees upon Western Europe, accusing everybody who spoke against to be "racist"? Why are "Antifa" actions so frequently violent? Why have so many of the university campuses became riddled with SJW radicals, becoming intolerant against a free debate? It has all been written below and planned since early 1960-ties. It is called a "Repressive Tolerance" theory by Herbert Marcuse. Since he recognized the fact that by 1960-ties Marxism has failed because the tolerant Western societies have largely satisfied the needs and aspirations of the working classes reducing their desire to change anything in the society. Furthermore, the radical left was no longer very successful in organizing the radical groups around various ideas because the society was already so tolerant of multiple ideas and allowed expression of so many ways of life and thoughts that there was no real need to be radical about anything. One can just do, say or worship almost anything, within the law.

Marcuse came up with the idea that in order to change (read - destroy) the existing order in the society, one has to attack the source of the "problem" (from his point of view) - the tolerance itself. He came up with the idea that in order to radicalize a minority and make them rally around a single cause, one has to dispense with any idea of tolerance to diverging views within that community, then keep pressing demands upon the mainstream society accusing them of intolerance, then escalating demands up to a point when the society begins firing back reverting from the tolerance into self-preservation mode, giving more opportunities to accusing the mainstream society of oppression. Eventually those accusations may turn out to be true, and a minority may have to pay a high price, however the main goal of the leftist radicals is not helping any minorities' causes - these are just their tools, but rather of destroying or destabilizing the society.

Last but not least. I believe that the Left, the Statism, Collectivism and all social manipulators will sooner or later fail here because Humans are wonderfully unpredictably disorganized, irreverend and noncompliant!

Heretic

Other Links and References:

(watch from minute 33-37)

"A CRITIQUE OF PURE TOLERANCE", ROBERT PAUL WOLFF, BARRINGTON MOORE, JR., HERBERT MARCUSE, 1970

Dr. Ben Carson on Hillary Clinton's Saul Alinsky Letters: ‘We've Had These Kinds of Warnings Before'

"I'd Organize Hell" - Saul Alinsky TV interview 1966

TOLERANCJA REPRESYWNA HERBERTA MARCUSE [by Krzysztof Karoń, in Polish]

Po czym rozpoznać marksizm? Krzysztof Karoń [in Polish, "How to recognize Marxism"]
Note: above video essay is fascinating. The author is putting a thesis that marxists and socialists lost out because most of the working class people choose good work ethics and organic work leading to organic economic growth benefiting an entire society, over their proposed revolutionary path. To counter that trend, the Left decided to undercut and denigrate the organic growth and good work ethics by undermining the entire professional education system in the West. There is a lot more, very insightful presentation and well worth watching.

Grzegorz Kolodziej - Fragment dzisiejszej odpowiedzi... [Facebook, the main post is in Polish, the comments are in English]

Brexit - more than the British bargained for

I favor the loosely tied confederate model of governance that the European Union has become.  It is modeled on past attempts at confederate states, examples of which are pre-Christian township of central Europe such as Lusitan, Prussian and Swiss Confederation (the only one surviving at present), Great Tartaria of Central Asia and Siberia, Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, and last but not least - the United States of America.    More often then not, adoption of the confederation model resulted in more civil rights because attempts by the local authorities to skew the system their way, could be challenged by the people using federal legislation. One interesting example was Ireland joining the EU which gradually washed away the autocratic rule of De Valera's theocrats resulting in more individual freedom.   Britain seems to be going the other way around, from a balance of power tied between the EU and the local government, towards giving all the power to the later.  That was probably the original intention behind the UKIP backers behind the scene as suggested by former prime minister Tony Blair in his recent "Open Britain" speech.     I am guessing, but that is the only reason that makes a sense  (actually there may be another non-exclusive reason that also makes a sense, see this post) .  Sure - British establishments wants more power and they will now be able to get it.  I guess they can hardly wait!.    The article I linked below describes some of the details of the process.  We can probably safely assume that it is just the beginning of the slippage towards authocracy in Britain, since once their elites taste the rule by decree it may be hard to revert to democracy.



The following article is the main reason I decided to post my today's rant:



What are Henry VIII powers? How Theresa May will use 'infamous' clauses to rewrite EU law

By Alice Foster (published Thu, Mar 30, 2017

Quote:

HENRY VIII powers will allow civil servants and ministers to change EU law without much parliamentary scrutiny before Brexit Day.


...

Prof Barnard, a senior fellow at the UK in a Changing Europe initiative, said it was a paradox because Brexit supporters voted to restore parliamentary sovereignty.

"People who voted to leave the EU thought they were taking back powers back to Parliament, to Westminster," she said during a briefing at King’s College London.

"What they didn’t think they would be doing is taking powers back to the executive - to the civil service, to the Government - over which there will be very little parliamentary scrutiny."

The huge volume of corrections needed to EU law mean that it would be impossible for each change to be done by Acts of Parliaments.

To solve the problem, the Great Repeal Bill White Paper published today said that the bill will "create powers to make secondary legislation".

It said: "The Great Repeal Bill will provide a power to correct the statute book, where necessary, to rectify problems occurring as a consequence of leaving the EU. "

Update 30-April-2017 - "May lives in parallel reality" article

Brexit negotiations began with a blazing row yesterday as Brussels flatly rejected Theresa May’s negotiating position and accused the British prime minister of living in a “parallel reality”.

The other 27 EU member states took just four minutes to agree a hardline stance on Brexit at a summit meeting in Brussels before Jean-Claude Juncker, the head of the European Commission, and Michel Barnier, the chief European Union Brexit negotiator, rounded on the British prime minister.

They told EU leaders that May had used a meeting with them on Wednesday night to demand that a “detailed outline” of a future free trade deal be in place before the UK agrees to pay any money to Brussels as part of the Brexit divorce deal. An EU diplomat said: “This was a rather incredible demand. It seemed as if it came from a parallel reality.”

Juncker warned yesterday that that approach would lead to an “early crash”, with Britain leaving the EU without a deal.

In an eight-page document outlining their position, the other 27 countries said the EU would “prepare itself to be able to handle the situation if the negotiations were to fail”. The guidelines also include offering Northern Ireland automatic EU membership should it join the Irish republic - a move seen as provocative in London - and giving Spain a veto over Gibraltar’s future relationship with the bloc.

Juncker and Barnier told leaders that the Wednesday dinner at May’s country retreat, known as Chequers, had also revealed huge differences over plans to recognise the rights of British citizens and EU nationals in each other’s countries.

Donald Tusk, president of the European Council, said a “serious offer” was needed on migrant rights from the UK before trade talks could begin.

An EU diplomat told The Sunday Times: “The UK’s position is miles apart, both on their financial obligations and on the EU citizens’ rights. The UK government simply wants to create a new category of ‘former EU citizens’ in their migration law, but our position is that we must go much further than that.”

The British prime minister’s stance that trade must come first was met with incredulity by EU officials, who said her chief EU sherpa, Oliver Robbins, had already agreed that the methodology for agreeing the Brexit bill would be ironed out first - along with the rights of EU citizens in Britain and the issue of the Irish border.

“She took a firm position against something we thought we had agreed,” a diplomatic source said. “It was completely unreal.” The source said the prime minister’s views on the financial settlement “border on the delusional”.

Over dinner, Juncker slapped down May by pulling out a copy of the EU-Canada trade deal, a 2,000-page document that took nearly a decade to negotiate, and recommended that the prime minister study its complexity.

Juncker’s aides said he then called Angela Merkel, Germany’s chancellor, and complained that May appeared unaware of issues communicated to her staff. According to one of Juncker’s aides, he told Merkel: “It went very badly. She is in a different galaxy. Based on the meeting, no deal is much more likely than finding agreement.”

--------

Update 3/06/2017

(watch all or from 13:30)

How Canadian political elite extracts money from the private sector

By first throttling the private sector with manufactured regulations, red tape and taxes to trigger recession, then by offsetting the deflationary trend by lowering the interest rates, generating money and credit - benefiting through their own controlled banking  and public sector system!

 A normally inflationary effect of the government stimulus, is balanced by the apparently intentionally engineered contraction in the private sector , such that the net effect is the overall stable currency.   However the net effect on the economy is anything but balanced - since the people working in the private sector, end up somehow earning less and less while people employed (I intentionally didn't put "work") in the public sector get paid more and more.  Especially in the high echelons of government departments and in the management of state or semi-state corporations.  The lavish pay is not only limited to the higher management but to the mid-ranking staff.  As anybody living in Canada, sooner or later notices the six-figure salaries of the employed firefighters, police officers, and doctors.

This is basically the applied Keynesian economics at it worst.

Originally   Keynes postulated, among other things, that during a recession, the government ought to stimulate the economy by investing counter-cyclically, using state reserves or debt, during the time when private sector is contracting.  Conversely, during economic expansion, the government ought to accumulate budgetary surplus by collecting higher taxes which also works to slow down the growth but will then serve as the resource to re-stimulate the economy during the next down cycle.

Our present Canadian oligarchs have improved the Keynesian system.  First they must have noticed that the flow of stimulus money and credit during recessionary time, flows mostly through their own government controlled institutions, enriching their personnel and management first, subsequently it may trickles down to the rest of the economy, if there is anything left, including the private sector (if lucky).

The must have noticed that the biggest post-WWII expansion of the government+banking sector in Canada and in the USA occurred during 1970-ties - at a time of severe oil crisis and recession - for the reason stated above!

The corrupt elites probably realized that they do not necessary have to wait each cycle for a next recessionary downturn to enjoy an opportunity associated with the "stimulus",  but they could simply manufacture such occurrences bu manipulating interest rates and spewing the red tape!

How did it happen in the 1980-ties and 1990-ties that the investment capital begun flowing out of the North American economies into China and elsewhere, creating local unemployment and rendering the large portion of Canadian and American working class destitute?

     When private business cannot make a profit by investing in certain countries, they of course don't invest there, their capital simply moves elsewhere!    But the interesting question is not "why" but "who"!

 Who set up the dis-incentives in the private sector to slow all productive investments?  Who set up the red tape, tax structure, labor and environmental laws to make it difficult to conduct business here?

  Who really benefits from government-imposed carbon tax and government engineered energy disaster in Ontario (and Alberta) resulting in the highest electricity prices in North America!

I submit the thesis that the government elites did engineer the crises in the recent times, and they are the main beneficiaries of their policies, while everybody else has to pay higher taxes and earns less!

Stan Bleszynski
11-March-2017

Simultaneous defeat of fake "democratic" and fake "republican" establishment

Good luck to our southern neighbors!   What's next for us?  I would love to see our non-Liberals, Regressive Conservatives and Archaic Democrats nicely voted out.  All together.
Stan

DEAR LIBERAL FRIENDS: We need to talk...

5 questions to Canadian politicians

1) Are you in favor of reducing all taxation and making it exactly equal for all entities, corporate and individuals? 

2) What is your take on dismantling the privileges and monopolies of the medical professional bodies, insurance providers, cellphone companies and legal professionals? 

3) What is your view on the legal policy of mandatory minimum sentencing for repeated offenders, expansion of the prison system, frequent police speed-checks and terrorism legislation? 

4) What is your view on nuclear power plants? 

5) Do you consider the data indicating that the climate may be cooling off rather than warming up, to be plausible and, are you open to consider alternative possibilities that the currently publicized theories may (or may not be) true?

As of to date, none of the questions were answered by any of the local politicians or their staff.

During the recent Federal election in Canada, I posted the above questions to the local candidates in Peterborough County by emails and by Facebook, to all political parties (PC,Liberal,NDP and FD) except Green party because their candidate does not seem to have an email or a phone.

One candidate (Maryam Monsef) immediately deleted my questions (see above) from her election campaign Facebook.

I got two replies only, one from the Force de Democratie party candidate (by phone) and one from a Liberal support staff.

None of the replies addressed the questions. No answers no real discussion or debate so far. Are we not supposed to ask questions and request some answers from the people who need our votes and our money in order to have jobs? Am I arrogant to demand the answers or are they arrogant by not answering them?

Stan Bleszynski