Saturday, December 9, 2017

Obama's legacy - his name was 44 ...

For quite a while I was thinking of posting a series of commentaries on that subject. I believe that certain events have to be described in the way that is consistent with the facts rather than with the "progressive" media narrative.

Today's rant has been triggered by this article:


BAGHDAD – Hundreds of ISIS fighters had just been chased out of a northern Syrian city and were fleeing through the desert in long convoys, presenting an easy target to U.S. A-10 "warthogs."

But the orders to bomb the black-clad jihadists never came, and the terrorists melted into their caliphate -- living to fight another day. The events came in August 2016, ...

How come that the Noble peace prize winner president did not authorize bombing of the retreating military ISIS convoys while at the same time he never seemed to hesitate to authorize drone attacks against Yemeni villages and civilians?

(my reflections written down 24/12/2017)

In my opinion, Obama will be remembered in future textbooks as probably one of the most incompetent presidents in the US history:

- authorized massive drone strikes against suspected terrorists causing massive civilian death in foreign countries without declaration of war against those countries

- granted secret service agencies an unprecedented power to implement a mass-surveillance program involving cellphone and internet networks,

- general ineptitude in handling international politics, most notably declaring a so-called "reset" with Russia that encouraged that country's opportunistic aggression towards its weakest neighbors such as Georgia in 2008 and Ukraine in 2013,

- inability to think ahead regarding North Korean problem, unwillingness to put a substantial pressure on North Korea at the time when they were starting to build
and expanding their nuclear and ballistic missile programs. This allowed it to create a major threat of war that many countries will have to deal with now.

- misplayed the Middle Eastern politics undermining various autocratic regimes such as Libia, Egypt and Syria without a consistent follow-up strategy

- prematurely withdrew from Iraq without establishing a stable system and alliances, (apart from Saudi Arabia alliance with the US, see below)

- misplayed or colluded with Saudi Arabia allowing Saudi regime to finance various CIA operation in the Middle East to undermine Shia influence from Iran, that resulted in the establishment of ISIS terrorist network which resulted in war, deaths and destruction

- allowed certain US allies in the Middle East (again, probably Saudis!) to finance smuggling of North African Muslim immigration to Europe, creating a political crisis in the EU

- allowed suspicious activity in Afganistan involving opium production and smuggling it to the West, to continue

- did not prevent or investigate foreign financing of the Unites States Democratic party, involving Saudis' Alwaleed Bin Talal and Clinton Foundation,

- worked closely with and protected the interests of Wall Street banking system, neglecting implementation of necessary reforms of the financial system,

- accepted and used "Global Warming" doctrine on climate change to promoted various domestic and international regulatory legislations resulting in crippling of the US (and Canadian) oil industry

- allowed or did not reform international certification standards to continue crippling of the American (and Canadian) industry

- implemented a badly thought out reform of financial side (only) of the health service by strengthening the health insurer's monopoly and making it compulsory, rather than addressing the cost issue by breaking the monopoly of the medical association and farmaceutical corporations

- allowed international trade treatise such as NFTA and TPP to be dominated and subjected to large corporate interests disregarding the need to truly free the international market from custom fees, restrictions and rules that affect small companies and individuals disproportionally badly,

- general financial ineptitude, overspending in the areas involving the military complex with a simultaneous neglect to simplify and lower the tax burden of the working class population (which ultimately led to a demise of his political party, IMHO)

Wednesday, November 22, 2017

Who financed recent destabilization of the Western World?

This is a "Big Picture" rant.

1) United States. 

I am proposing a thesis that the unnatural (to the American tradition and culture) shift towards leftist collectivism in the American politics and in the high school system, was influenced financed and coordinated by Saudi Arabian political and religious elite.    Financing of the United States democratic party through Clinton Foundation and financing of the Bushes family by supporting their oil interests in the Middle East.   It was an alliance.  It came to an abrupt end earlier this month through Trump-instigated palace coup-d'etat on the Saudi's court, that ousted a couple of hundred top Saudi oligarch and billionaires, most of them open supporters and financiers of the American "Progressives" (who are being investigated and in the process of being ousted in the US).

2) Europe

Over a million refugees were shipped to Europe in the last 2 years.  Initially from Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan, later on a vast majority being Muslims from Africa.   Africa is not all Muslim.  Why are all African immigrants Muslim?   Human trafficking gangs charge  a few thousand dollars to smuggle a person from Africa therefore the total cost of smuggling a million people to Europe is probably a couple of billion dollars.  There is only one country that  have had a plan and could afford it without blinking:  Saudi Arabia!

3) Middle East

How come that all of the American weapons left behind in Iraq a few years ago when Obama withdrew his troops, locking out the American bases from the Iraqi troops? Most if not all of the equipment left behind was later on carried away by Sunni terrorists under  Al Baghdadi, which quickly was renamed as ISIS?   Absolutely not an accident!   It must have been preplanned and coordinated.  Whose interest was to create a fanatical Sunni army that would saw terror against all Iraqi Shia nations, against Syrian nations and against Iran's allies?  Saudi's oligarchs together with their US allies (under the old pre-Trump government)!       How come that ISIS came to an abrupt end "coincidentally" with the Saudi palace coup this months, following Trump visit a few week previously, following a coup in Turkey a few month earlier?   It matches the narrative really well - the narrative of the unholly alliance between fundamental Saudi Islamic oligarchs, and Western "Progressives" and Leftists being in the process of broken up by the Trump administration.   

Sunday, November 19, 2017

Masonic enemy from within - Polish lost war of 1939

Interesting video by Andrzej Pochylski on the beginning of WWII, German-Polish war of 1939.  This video is in Polish, I will summarize the author's thesis:

Many if not most most Polish high command generals including the army chief marshal Rydz-Smigly, abandoned their posts and command  in Poland in just the first days of war, leaving behind the lower ranking officers in charge in charge of not fully mobilized army without orders or guidelines.  The author builds a thesis that Polish generals deserted their post because they followed specific orders to flee Poland,  obeying Freemasonic order to which they all (or most of them) belonged. The orders emanated supposedly from London according to the author.   Even though German army was in 1939 stronger (1.5M vs 1M soldiers) but not hugely stronger and not as well armed as later in 1941, making a defensive war in Polish situation of 1939 not a hopeless endeavor.  If fought properly, it would incur extremely heavy losses upon the attacking armies, as an example of  Fino-Soviet war of 1939 has showed.

Wednesday, September 6, 2017

Britain isn’t even keeping pace with the EU "corpse" in spite of cheap pound

Interesting article:

As the UK economy sputters, it's all systems go in the eurozone,

Richard Partington


"We’ve shackled ourselves to a corpse," said Douglas Carswell in the days before he abandoned the Tory whip to join Ukip. "We pay for the privilege of being members of this poverty-producing club."

Read more on Brexit here.

Friday, August 11, 2017

Google fires employee for speaking out

Guest post by Derek Coulter
(posted with the author's permission, the title was added by me, S.B.)

James Damore is the author of the now-famous internal critique of Google's oppressive leftist culture for which he was summarily dismissed. This, despite his thoroughly impressive resume and education. The eternal war against wrongdoers, loudmouths, and idiots can often overshadow the fact that our society is (still) mostly populated by good, upstanding, well-meaning people. Some are especially impressive in terms of achievement, as in the case of Mr Damore. In the minds of cultural Marxists, however, such glaring inequity simply cannot be.
The obviousness that we are all different, each with our own unique advantages and disadvantages, worse pointing it out, and worse still pointing out the idiocy in denying it, is what piqued the wrath and scorn of the legion of brainwashed malcontents that infest places like Silicon Valley and companies like Google. To them, he committed a thought crime: He spoke his mind on diversity, the tactics used to further it, and the pathological egalitarianism at its core. These, as it so happens, are among their most treasured ideologies.
The tech industry, by the nature of the work, is stacked with left-brain, analytical thinkers. Certainly, society desperately needs such people, and we have benefitted greatly from their contributions. As individuals, they do very well in academics, as information sponges and in linear problem-solving. Intelligence to this type of individual is measured by how much and how well they acquire, retain, and execute provided information (e.g., from academia, media). The other side of the coin, however, is that questions as to the veracity of said information seldom occur or have little priority. This type of mind exhibits a blindness for big-picture considerations, and often fails to grasp the broad consequences of its decisions and actions. Not surprisingly, these individuals also tend to be highly susceptible to indoctrination. These are our Ph.D's, our so-called experts. It's no surprise that Google and other tech companies are majority leftist, where most of its employees readily buy into the idealistic, googly-eyed (pun intended!) notions they were taught to buy into, no matter how bereft of supporting reason, evidence, good sense, and wisdom.
The tech industry certainly comes up with interesting and impressive gizmos and stuff. Their wares are products of pure intellect, but I question the wisdom of elevating its people to positions of social and cultural influence. A healthy society cannot have as its thought-leaders those who are pathologically unaware of and cut off from the higher facets of life and of being. The character of thought bound by the physical and the formative (intellectual) is entirety analytical, linear, and morose. As complete beings, as conscious monads, we are more than this, but sadly most people at this time in history are not even aware of the higher aspects of the self, the creative and the archetypal. These higher aspects yield an almost forgotten treasure, synthesis in thought. This entirely different character of thought yields a breadth of awareness in the individual--knowing without learning. We need doers as the engine of society, but seers must sit in driver seat.
Diversity of thought, diversity of perspective: These make for a strong social order, at any scale. This is the essence of the free market of ideas, which has the lovely property of tending to act as a thought optimality engine. Emphasis on ethnic or gender diversity, on the other hand, displaces the mental for the physical, and misunderstands that one of these facets of being is the dog while the other is the tail. This is not to mention that a potentially happy consequence of a culture favouring a diversity of thought also finds that it guarantees a (real) diversity of people.
We actually need a 'left' in a politically healthy society, as a counterbalance against a supposed 'right'. This may be a false political paradigm, but its true basis is in the concept of the divine feminine and the divine masculine, which are aspects of being found in everything and in every one of us. However, today's leftists, judging from most of their positions, are engaged in nothing less than a war on reality. It has to be reformed from the inside out. But at present, the left finds itself in a dreamland of its own making.

Derek Coulter